Compare
Comparing AR software, in context
If you’re comparing AR tools, look past feature lists to how each one handles the work that doesn’t follow the happy path. Here’s what to ask every vendor, and how Fazeshift compares with the tools buyers often evaluate alongside us.
What to actually compare
Don’t compare how many agents a platform has. Compare how much work gets resolved. Put these questions to every vendor on your list.
When an invoice is overdue
Does the platform simply prioritize a balance, or does it also surface the reason payment is delayed, and drive the next action based on that reason?
When a payment doesn’t match
How much work must an analyst do to find remittance, identify a parent-child relationship, investigate a short pay, and complete the correct ERP action?
When the answer lives in email or a portal
Can the workflow retrieve, interpret and act on relevant context across systems, or does the team have to track it down manually?
When the business has its own rules
Who maps those rules, deploys the workflows, handles exceptions, and evolves them when your customer and business requirements change?
When you measure the outcome
How many exceptions are fully resolved, how many analyst touches are removed, how quickly is cash applied, and what measurable effect does that have on DSO and team capacity?
The best AR platform isn’t the one that generates the most activity. It’s the one that helps your team get to the right outcome with the least unnecessary manual work.
Book a demoComparisons
Comparing options? Add Fazeshift to the list.
Bring a few of your hardest payments to a demo, and see how Fazeshift works through them.