Fazeshift’s AR agents read the reference your client’s system actually generated — a client reference number, a clinician or traveler’s name, a shift, a week-ending date — then match it to the right invoice and client account and post the cash. They work across your ATS, your ERP, your bank, and the VMS portals your team logs into every week.
Remittance names a clinician, not an invoice
$47,310.00 M. Alvarez
It references the worker, the shift, or a portal report instead — and that gap gets closed by hand, three ways.
It cites a client reference number, a clinician or traveler’s name, a shift, or a week-ending date pulled from the client’s own system — not the invoice number you billed under, and not a PO number either. Someone translates it by hand before a payment can post, and the translation isn’t standardized even within one client relationship.
For a large share of clients, remittance data doesn’t arrive as a document at all — it sits inside a VMS or MSP portal your team has to log into and pull. Reconciling it means comparing the portal’s report against your ERP’s open invoices line by line, often in a spreadsheet built and kept up by hand for exactly this purpose.
Growth in this vertical means more brands, more divisions, more client codes under one umbrella — sometimes thousands of them, each requiring its own mapping into the ERP. A payment that’s correct at the entity level can still land against the wrong client code, and cleaning up that mapping becomes its own ongoing project.
Built for how staffing actually gets paid
Your ATS stays where it is and your ERP stays the system of record. The agent works across both — plus your bank, your inbox, and the VMS portals your clients require — and posts back only what you’ve approved it to post.
Step 01
Staffing AR typically spans an ATS like Bullhorn, an ERP that’s the actual ledger, and a bank feed — and none of them talk to each other by default. The agent reads open invoices wherever they sit and pulls payments and remittance from the bank and lockbox, without asking you to consolidate anything first.
Where it shows up in your week
The same platform, pointed at the parts of staffing billing that take the most time.
What it looks like in production
One staffing platform turned cash application over to the agent on live production data — not a pilot — and watched its aged receivables move fast.
See customer stories77.6%
Drop in aged receivables
At one staffing platform we work with, 90+ day AR fell from $24.6M to $5.5M within a trailing month — on trailing 365-day credit sales of roughly $536M.
Works with what you already run
The agent connects to Bullhorn for the ATS data underneath your billing, reads your open invoices, and posts cash application back to your ERP, while payments and remittance come straight from your bank and lockbox in whatever format they arrive. For legacy, on-prem ERPs, the agent ingests AR data via file feeds instead. Running a different ERP, or a VMS your clients require? Tell us and we’ll confirm what connecting it looks like.
View integrations
The portal reports, the payments that cite a clinician or a week-ending date, the umbrella wires that cover a dozen client codes. Bring a batch to the call and we’ll show you how the agent reads and applies them.
